mehreenkasana:

Nona Willis Aronowitz for GOOD magazine. Read up before it’s too late, friends.

What would a post-SOPA internet look like? Here’s a glimpse of a dystopian future.

  • Let’s start with the personal: Your Tumblr, Twitter feed, or Facebook page could be “executed” at any time. A fair number of us have online homes these days, whether it’s a Wordpress blog with half a dozen readers or a Twitter page with half a million followers. If you happen to post copyrighted material on one of these sites—and you almost certainly do, especially if it’s not monetized—your domain could be blocked, just like that. In the past, the copyright holder could invoke the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which would warn the site to take the material down. There are no such warnings with SOPA.
  • Google searches would never be the same. Search engines are slanted as it is, burying certain sites they deem inappropriate or irrelevant. SOPA would put this bias on steroids. Any site that may contain copyright-infringing material wouldn’t appear in the search results. Even direct searches for domain names may turn up blank pages. Worst of all, the decision to block content is at the discretion of the internet service provider, leaving little recourse if a site owner believes he’s been blocked unfairly.
  • It could create sneaky company wars, and ideological ones, too. Not everybody would post copyrighted content on a site accidentally. Rival companies could try to snuff out each other’s sites by posting illegal content in their comments and on their forums. And what about political or religious crusaders? Anti-abortion activists could write a copyright-violating comment on Planned Parenthood’s blog to shut the site down. Creationists could write a letter to the editor of an online science magazine that’s riddled with plagiarized content. President Obama’s staff could post copyrighted paragraphs on Mitt Romney’s site. And so on.
  • Wikis and photo sites would be things of the past. Who would risk exposing a site to literally billions of users who could accidentally or deliberately post copyrighted content? Wikipedia, Wikileaks, even Flickr and other photo sites would be too much of a liability for site proprietors.
  • And more.

(via iamthecrime)

163 01.18.12
dropshadow
  1. hamuu reblogged this from marsha-britney
  2. inhellsdespair reblogged this from acornsandarrows
  3. owldee reblogged this from acornsandarrows
  4. acornsandarrows reblogged this from rosesmusings
  5. hiaplayswithfire reblogged this from wildunknownmen
  6. vsthepomegranate reblogged this from pushinghoopswithsticks
  7. wildunknownmen reblogged this from iamthecrime
  8. retardedmeowsoflove reblogged this from hkezza
  9. anizombiefangirl reblogged this from ollieosa
  10. dramaticfuckery reblogged this from brandos
  11. strawberrypookmoo reblogged this from femmenoire
  12. shootminiup reblogged this from ollieosa
  13. ollieosa reblogged this from hkezza
  14. lauratron reblogged this from iamthecrime
  15. derfreischutze reblogged this from thesoftbloodynose
  16. dr-orangeranger reblogged this from squintyoureyes
  17. babeheffron reblogged this from thesoftbloodynose
  18. floacist reblogged this from brandos
  19. wavesfluorescent reblogged this from mehreenkasana
  20. merrybutts reblogged this from rosesmusings
  21. radcupcake reblogged this from vaiya and added:
    nononononono. I’d lose my mind. I’d fail out of school. This is not good.
  22. sprnvasidra reblogged this from jennhoney
  23. neverwillstop reblogged this from agent355
  24. muntazir reblogged this from vzhivanie
  25. myugh reblogged this from femmenoire
  26. hkezza reblogged this from strangeandamazing
  27. strangeandamazing reblogged this from rosesmusings
  28. vaiya reblogged this from iamthecrime
  29. bluewingedpixie reblogged this from ellieptical
  30. bandgeek-musicfreak reblogged this from uselesswhitenoise
  31. rosesmusings reblogged this from anygoddamnedcolleen
A